Public publication audit

Language: English · 简体中文

Historical snapshot: the conclusions and counts below belong to audit revision 5964145. They are not a current readiness result. Rerun the relevant gates before publishing a new clean-root package or changing repository visibility.

Conclusion

The reviewed clean-root control plane was suitable for public technical review. Evaluation orchestration and run summaries later added public owner dependencies that must be included in the next audit. The original repository must not be made public directly. A public release should use a new Git root history and retain the current repository as a private archive.

Evidence recorded by the audit

Scope	Result	Findings
Clean-root export	direct-public-safe	0
Current private tree and reachable Git history	clean-history-publication-required	790

The audited clean-root export contained the dependency-free public core, synthetic tests, public readiness tools, security and contribution policies, and public CI workflows with no sensitive information. The current repository also provides evaluation orchestration, which depends on public quant-market-research and portfolio-backtester repositories. Those dependencies, the evaluation orchestration, and the run-summary module must be included in the next strict public-readiness gate.

The private-history result was expected. The retained repository contains historical strategy names, research documents, provider references, and private workspace content. This report records categories and counts, not sensitive content.

Required publication process

1. Regenerate the clean-root export from a reviewed revision.
2. Run the clean-tree audit and strict public-readiness gate.
3. Create a new Git root history from the export.
4. Run a full-history audit on that new root.
5. Complete human review of strategy and intellectual-property content, dependencies, licenses, and CI results before changing repository visibility.

This audit does not authorize changing repository visibility.